AI Research Synthesiser

Paste interview transcripts or notes. Get themes, pain points and insights, each linked to the exact quotes behind it, so you can see what's evidence and what's the AI's reading.

Example: five fictional interviews about booking a GP appointment.

Pain point

Supported4 quotes from 4 of 5 participants

AI wording People struggle to get through by phone at the morning rush and often lose the appointments they need.

Their wordsI redialled for twenty minutes.P1
Their wordsI phone. And that's a whole story because everyone tells you to ring at eight o'clock.P2
Their wordsI rang at eight like everyone else. Engaged. Rang again, engaged.P3
Pain point

Supported4 quotes from 4 of 5 participants

AI wording Logging in, resetting passwords and verifying identity regularly block people from using the online booking route.

Their wordsI'd also want the login to just work.P1
Their wordsIt wanted a photo of my passport, then a video of my face.P3
Their wordsThe problem is logging in. It sends a code to my phone by text, and the code expires after five minutes.P4
Pain point

Supported4 quotes from 4 of 5 participants

AI wording People do not know which clinician suits their need or what the appointment type names mean, so they guess.

Their wordsNobody asked me what I wanted.P1
Their wordsI didn't want to waste a doctor's time if a nurse could do itP3
Their wordsI don't know what triage means.P4
Pain point

Supported2 quotes from 2 of 5 participants

AI wording Being asked about symptoms quickly by a receptionist feels awkward or like a test, making people unsure what to say.

Their wordsI felt a bit awkward telling a stranger.P1
Their wordsThe receptionist is lovely, but she asks me things quickly, like it's a test.P2
Goal

Supported2 quotes from 2 of 5 participants

AI wording People want to see available times and clinicians directly and choose a slot themselves rather than wait for a call back.

Their wordsIf I could see the free slots myself, like booking a restaurant.P1
Their wordsTell me who I'd see, what they can do, and when. And let me pick a time.P3
Goal

Supported2 quotes from 2 of 5 participants

AI wording People want clinician roles and booking options explained in simple words, with pictures, large text or sign language.

Their wordsI'd like someone to explain it in plain words, on a leaflet or a website with proper large text.P2
Their wordsI would like it written in simpler words with a picture, or a short video in sign language explaining the options.P4
Pain point

One participant1 quote from 1 of 5 participants

AI wording Booking forms with unlabelled controls leave screen reader users unable to tell what each option is for.

Their wordsIt doesn't say what they're for. So I can't tell which one is which.P2
Pain point

One participant1 quote from 1 of 5 participants

AI wording Booking on behalf of another person raises concerns about seeing private medical records and who else can view them.

Their wordsI don't want to read things she hasn't told me.P5
Pain point

One participant1 quote from 1 of 5 participants

AI wording There is no reliable way to request a sign language interpreter during booking, which affects privacy and access.

Their wordsYou're supposed to be able to ask for one when you book, but there's no box for it.P4
Other

One participant1 quote from 1 of 5 participants

AI wording Clear text message reminders with a set time and one-tap cancellation are seen as a working part of the process.

Their wordsText messages. When they text me a reminder with a clear time, that's good.P4

Insights Interpretation

  • Access barriers at the login, phone and form stages stop people before they reach any choice about who or when to see.

    The AI's reading, not evidence. Rests on: , ,

  • Unclear clinician options combined with rushed receptionist questions leave people guessing and losing appointments.

    The AI's reading, not evidence. Rests on: , ,

  • People want to see and choose their own slots, but privacy and interpreter gaps make the online route hard to trust.

    The AI's reading, not evidence. Rests on: , ,

What the AI left out (21 of 41 participant turns had no quote taken from them; 49% covered)

Scan these for anything the themes missed or that contradicts them.

P1

  • S1-2 Yes, about three weeks ago. I'd had a cough that wouldn't shift, so I thought I'd better get it looked at. I'm 34, I work in an office, and I'm generally okay with technology.
  • S1-4 I tried the surgery's website. There's a button that says "Book online", but when I pressed it, it asked me for a login I didn't think I had. I vaguely remember signing up during the pandemic.
  • S1-6 I tried to reset the password. The email never came, or it went to spam, I don't know. After about ten minutes I gave up and phoned instead.
  • S1-10 Really frustrating. I've got a job and I can't sit on hold at eight every morning. The receptionist said to ring again tomorrow and start again. That felt like being punished for being ill.
  • S1-12 I did, and the same thing happened. On the third day I got a slot, but it was a telephone appointment, not in person, and I'd wanted the doctor to listen to my chest.
  • S1-18 Only that I don't blame the receptionists. They're doing their best with a system that gives them nothing. It feels like everyone's stuck in the same queue.

P2

  • S2-2 I'm 67, retired. I'm partially sighted, so I use a screen reader on my laptop and a magnifier on my phone. I've been with the same surgery for over thirty years.
  • S2-8 It doesn't, really. I do it because I've no choice. I once gave up after forty minutes and asked my daughter to do it on her phone while she was on the train.
  • S2-14 A phone number that answers, and a person who isn't rushing me. Or a website that works with my screen reader, with proper labels, and a choice written in sentences. I don't want to be clever, I just want to be seen.
  • S2-16 Please test it with people like me. Half of these sites look beautiful, but I can't get past the first page. And please don't assume everyone has a smartphone or finds it easy to remember another password.

P3

  • S3-2 Maybe three or four times a year. I'm 28, I work in marketing, and I use apps for everything, so I'd expect this to be easy.
  • S3-6 Eventually, on the third go. I nearly gave up. Then I logged in and the appointments tab just said "No appointments available".
  • S3-8 Um, well, in theory, yes. But I wouldn't say that's been my experience, really. The form was fine once I found it, but it asked me to describe my symptoms in a box and then said someone would reply within two working days. That's not booking, that's an enquiry.
  • S3-16 I get that the 8am rush is a demand problem. But if the app worked, half those people wouldn't need to ring. The bit that annoys me is that they've built two systems and neither one is finished.

P4

  • S4-2 I'm 45, I'm a bus driver. I'm Deaf, and I use British Sign Language. English is my second language, so long paragraphs of text take me a while. I mostly use my phone for everything.
  • S4-4 I can't use the phone, obviously. So I use the app, or I go in person and write on a notepad. Going in costs me half a day if I swap a shift.
  • S4-16 A box for "I need a BSL interpreter" that actually works, and simple wording. Then the login. I don't need more features, I need the basic things to not be a fight.

P5

  • S5-2 I'm 52. I work part-time and I look after my mum, who's 81 and lives a few streets away. She doesn't use the internet at all, so I do most of her appointments.
  • S5-10 No. The form just has a tick box. There's no plain explanation of what I'd see and what I wouldn't.
  • S5-14 Being able to book on her behalf without it feeling like I'm snooping. Maybe a version where I only see appointments, not medical details. And the eight o'clock thing needs to change. I've had to arrange my work around it for years.
  • S5-16 Only that it's stressful being the person in the middle. Mum feels like a burden, I feel like I'm failing her, and the system doesn't help either of us.

Kept in this tab until you close it. Download or copy anything you want to keep. Your text is sent to Anthropic, the company behind Claude, to produce the synthesis. Under Anthropic's commercial terms it isn't used to train their models. We don't store it.

How to use it well

Three stages, in order.

Provide

Raw words, names removed

Transcripts or notes, one source per participant.

Review

Count the people behind a theme

Trust themes with quotes from several people. Check what was left out.

Validate

Interpretation is a lead

Re-read quotes in context, then test the AI's reading.

Built from an idea by Jonathan Hill, UX strategy and research trainer.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

How is evidence told apart from interpretation?

Every quote on a theme is checked against the text you pasted. If it appears word for word, it is shown exactly as you wrote it and counts as evidence. The AI's one-line summary of each theme, and all insights, are labelled as the AI's wording. A theme with no quote that checks out is marked Interpretation.

What does "One participant" mean?

The theme has verified quotes from exactly one source. It may still be true and important, but only one person said it, so treat it as something to test with more people.

Why was a quote rejected?

The AI proposed words that are not in your text: a paraphrase, an edited quote, a merge of two sentences, or something the interviewer said. We drop those and show you how many. Rejected quotes are never shown, because they aren't your participants' words.

What should I paste?

Raw words, not your summary: the tool can only check what is in the text. Use one box per participant so that "how many people said it" means something, and keep speaker labels like Interviewer: and Sam: at the start of each turn. You can also load .txt or .vtt files. Add your research question to steer the grouping.

How many interviews can I use?

Up to 10 sources and about 120,000 characters in one run, roughly two one-hour interviews or eight short sets of notes. Three to eight interviews is the sweet spot. One interview can only ever give "One participant" themes. If you go over, split it into two runs; we never cut text off silently.

Is my data stored or used to train AI?

Your text is sent to Anthropic, the company behind Claude, to produce the synthesis. Under Anthropic's commercial terms it isn't used to train their models. We don't store your transcripts or the result on our servers. In your browser they stay in this tab's session storage until you close the tab or press Reset.

Should I remove names?

Yes. Replace participants' names, employers, places and anything else that identifies them before you paste. We mask emails and phone numbers and swap speaker names for P1, P2 and so on, but we can't catch everything. Don't paste health, religion, ethnicity or other sensitive details unless your participants agreed to it.

What must I still check myself?

Read each Supported theme's quotes in context. Treat Interpretation and One participant themes as hypotheses. Check who you interviewed and who is missing, scan what the AI left out for anything that contradicts a theme, and don't present counts as percentages of users.

Can I turn the themes into a persona?

Yes. Tick the themes you want and open the persona builder with them filled in: pain points, goals and behaviours from the theme titles, and a few of your participants' own words as quotes. Nothing is invented, so you add the name and role. You can also send themes to a card sort as cards.

Is it free?

Yes, with no account. There is a daily limit on runs so that it stays free for everyone.

Learning UX yourself

Beginner UX (AI) Design starts 12 January 2027.

Tools help you do the work. They don't teach you the judgement behind it. Beginner UX (AI) Design is taught live online by working UX professionals, built for career-changers with no design background.

See the course

Working in a team rather than learning on your own? We run in-house UX training built around your own product.